OSHA Inspection: ELMER ELIAS VASQUEZ ESCOBAR

Issued

Sep 10, 2019

Abate by

Sep 16, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets:  2435 Anderson Estates Court, Marietta, GA.: Workers standing underneath areas where roof shingles were being installed were exposed to head injuries, in that; no head protection was used.

Issued

Sep 10, 2019

Abate by

Sep 16, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  a) 2435 Anderson Estates Court, Marietta, GA: Workers installing roof shingles were exposed to eye injuries in that; no eye protection was being worn when using Metabo NV 45AB2 strip nailers.

Issued

Sep 10, 2019

Abate by

Sep 16, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) 2435 Anderson Estates Court, Marietta, GA: Employees were exposed to lower level fall hazards of over 25-feet while install roofing shingles, in that; no fall protection was being used.

Issued

Sep 10, 2019

Abate by

Sep 16, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:    a) 2435 Anderson Estates Court, Marietta, GA: Workers installing roof shingles were exposed to back and torso injuries, and mechanical asphyxiation via falls, in that; body belts were used in lieu of body harnesses as part of a personal fall arrest system.

Issued

Sep 10, 2019

Abate by

Sep 16, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed  a) 2435 Anderson Estates Court, Marietta, GA: Workers using a 32-foot aluminum extension ladder to access a roof were exposed to lower level fall hazard of approximately 23-feet,  in that; the ladder's side rails extended less than 3-feet above the roof surface.   a) 2435 Anderson Estates Court, Marietta, GA: Workers using a 20 - foot aluminum extension ladder to access a roof were exposed to lower level fall hazard of approximately 10.5 - feet,  in that; the ladder's side rails extended less than 3-feet above the roof surface.