OSHA Inspection: FRAMEMYTV.COM, LLC.

Issued

Sep 25, 2019

Abate by

Oct 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,842 · Current $1,989 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.  Location: Spray Booth  On or about August 8, 2019, medical evaluations were not conducted for employees required to don 3M tight fitting half face respirators.

Issued

Sep 25, 2019

Abate by

Oct 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.  Location: Spray Booth  On or about August 8, 2019, employees were not fit tested prior to initially donning 3M tight fitting half face respirators.

Issued

Sep 25, 2019

Abate by

Oct 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $319 · Current $223 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained.  Location: Spray Booth  On or about August 8, 2019, no visible gauges were installed in the flammable paint finish spray booth.

Issued

Sep 25, 2019

Abate by

Oct 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $319 · Current $223 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use  Location: Spray Booth  On or about August 9, 2019, a written respiratory protection program was not established for required respirator use inside and around the spray booth.

Issued

Sep 25, 2019

Abate by

Oct 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form.  Location: Spray Booth  On or about August 9, 2019, no identification or evaluation of the respiratory hazards was conducted for chemicals hazards such as, but not limited too, acrylic polyurethane, butanone, and xylene.

Issued

Sep 25, 2019

Abate by

Oct 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $319 · Current $223 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii).  Location: Facility   On or about August 8, 2019, a written hazard communication program was not developed where products such as, acrylic polyurethane, Satin MAP paint, INSTAPAK component A, and INSTAPAK component B were used.