NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: KATERRA CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of KATERRA CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 200 GOFFE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 344222435.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KATERRA CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 200 GOFFE STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06511
- Mailing
- 9305 EAST VIA DE VENTURA SUITE 200, SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85258
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 28
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.502 D10 I
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $5,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(10)(i): Except as provided in paragraph (d)(10)(ii) of this section, when vertical lifelines were used, each employee was not attached to a separate lifeline: Jobsite: The three (3) employees working on the roof were attached to only one (1) life line.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5400
- — Z (S) $7711
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,639 · Current $7,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee Jobsite: The single anchorage point that was used to attach personal fall arrest systems for three (3) employees was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7100
- — Z (S) $9639
1926.502 D15 II
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, and not installed under the supervision of a qualified person. Jobsite: The anchorage used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment for three (3) employees was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $5,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet and 10 feet above the ground while working on a flat roof were not provided with training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $5400
- — Z (S) $7711
1926.1101 D05
- Issued
- Jan 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 9, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,639 · Current $7,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1101(d)(5): All general contractors on a construction project which included work covered by this standard were not deemed to exercise general supervisory authority over the work covered by this standard, even though the general contractor was not qualified to serve as the asbestos "competent person" as defined by paragraph (b) of this section: Jobsite: The general contractor did not exercise general supervisory authority over the subcontractor who was performing asbestos abatement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $7100
- — Z (S) $9639
More inspections at Katerra Construction, LLC
View Katerra Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344222435.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.