NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FAIRFIELD ROOFING, LLC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of FAIRFIELD ROOFING, LLC in 200 GOFFE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344222443.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FAIRFIELD ROOFING, LLC
- Site address
- 200 GOFFE STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06511
- Mailing
- 26 ORLAND STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06605
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.502 D10 I
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(10)(i): Except as provided in paragraph (d)(10)(ii) of this section, when vertical lifelines were used, each employee was not attached to a separate lifeline: Jobsite: The three (3) employees working on the roof were attached to only one (1) life line.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1591.1
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 30, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee Jobsite: The single anchorage point that was used to attach personal fall arrest systems for three (3) employees was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989.4
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.502 D15 II
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, and not installed under the supervision of a qualified person. Jobsite: The anchorage used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,194 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees who were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet and 10 feet above the ground while working on a flat roof were not provided with training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1193.5
- — Z (S) $1705
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344222443.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.