MILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CONNECTICUT SIGN SERVICE, LLC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CONNECTICUT SIGN SERVICE, LLC in 140 OLD GATE LANE, MILFORD, CT 06461 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 344222468.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONNECTICUT SIGN SERVICE, LLC
- Site address
- 140 OLD GATE LANE
- City
- MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06461
- Mailing
- 500 INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, DEEP RIVER, CT 06417
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,194 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1926.404(b)(1)(i): General. The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors Jobsite: The employer did not utilize a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) or a assured equipment ground program (AEGP)where an employee was operating a hand-held power saw that was powered by an extension cord.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1193.5
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,785 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: The employee performing drilling task on the roof of a commercial building under construction was not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 18 feet to the ground by the use of a guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2784.6
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: Jobsite: The top step of the Werner stepladder was used by an employee to gain access to the area above the ceiling tiles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1591.1
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards. Jobsite: The employees using the Werner stepladder to perform work on the light fixture were not trained in the proper means to erect the ladder, recognize hazards related to ladders, and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: Jobsite: The attachment point of the employee's body harness was not located in the center of the employee's back near shoulder lever or above the employee's head.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344222468.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.