Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL LOPEZ LAZCANO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL LOPEZ LAZCANO in 8130, 8134, 8138 AND 8144 KINGFISHER LANE, PICKERINGTON, OH 43147 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344224639.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Lopez Lazcano — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Lopez Lazcano is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8130, 8134, 8138 AND 8144 KINGFISHER LANE
City
PICKERINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43147
Mailing
1532 LARK DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2019
Abate by
Oct 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $2,387 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about August 12, 2019, employees performed roofing work on residential buildings (condominiums) without any fall protection. The employer did not require and employees were not protected by standard railing, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems. Due to this condition, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of nine feet during shingle tear off activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2387
  • — Z (S) $3410

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344224639.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.