BURLINGTON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: GILBERTSON STAINED GLASS STUDIO L.L.C.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GILBERTSON STAINED GLASS STUDIO L.L.C. in 108 MCHENRY ST., BURLINGTON, WI 53105 (NAICS 238150). OSHA activity number 344228671.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GILBERTSON STAINED GLASS STUDIO L.L.C.
- Site address
- 108 MCHENRY ST.
- City
- BURLINGTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53105
- Mailing
- 705 MADISON ST., LAKE GENEVA, WI 53147
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238150
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: (a) A supported scaffold that was in use for the purpose of window trim scraping operations was not designed by a qualified person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2273
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Where the employer made a demonstration that a space wider than 1 inch was necessary between adjacent plank units and the platform and uprights, the platform was not planked or decked as fully as possible. (a) All working levels of the scaffold were not fully planked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports. This exposed employees to a fall hazard to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.451 G04 IV
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(iv): Midrails were not installed at a height approximately midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the platform surface: (a) Employees conducting work operations from a supported scaffold were not protected from falling to the lower level. Midrails were not installed midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the working platform This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 13 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. (a) Employees conducting work from a supported scaffold had not been trained on the hazards associated with scaffold work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. (a) An employee walking/working from a flat roof was not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 13.7 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2273
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,932 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: (a) The Keller extension ladder being used for access to the roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1932
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238150)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344228671.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.