WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, OH —
OSHA Inspection: EFREN MUNOZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EFREN MUNOZ in 655 E ALEX BELL DR, WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, OH 45459 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344241047.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EFREN MUNOZ
- Site address
- 655 E ALEX BELL DR
- City
- WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45459
- Mailing
- 150 BEESON DR, FLORENCE, KY 41042
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): (Accident prevention responsibilities.) Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers. On Aug. 15, 2019, located at a residential roof structure, there were no frequent and regular inspections being performed by a competent person in that employees were: wearing fall protection harnesses, but not tied off, while performing roofing work; wrapping the ends of lifelines around wooden joists as anchor points for personal fall arrest; using lifelines to rappel down the roof instead of as part of personal fall arrest; and performing roofing work at potential fall heights of greater than 25 feet without using a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On Aug. 15, 2019, located throughout a residential roof structure, employees were performing roofing work without utilizing a fall protection system at potential fall heights greater than 25 feet above ground level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2): ("General.") Employers shall provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for an employee, and shall comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before that employee begins the work that necessitates the fall protection. On Aug. 15, 2019, employees were not provided with roof anchors before beginning roofing work at potential fall heights of greater than 25 feet above ground level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): ("Training Program.") The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. The employer did not provide a training program for employees performing roofing work from a steep pitch residential roof structure while not utilizing a fall protection system and exposed to potential fall heights of greater than 25 feet above ground level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344241047.