HARTFORD, WI —
OSHA Inspection: ROMERO WOOD
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROMERO WOOD in 513 E. SUMNER ST., HARTFORD, WI 53027 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344245030.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROMERO WOOD
- Site address
- 513 E. SUMNER ST.
- City
- HARTFORD
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53027
- Mailing
- 530 W. GREENFIELD AVE., MILWAUKEE, WI 53204
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building, thereby exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building, thereby exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure a ladder used for access was at least 3 feet above the landing surface, exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure an adequate ladder was used for access. Workers were using a step ladder in the closed position for access, thereby exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B12
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive side rails: (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure a ladder with nonconductive side rails was used near an energized power line, thereby exposing workers to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure workers were using head protection when exposed to overhead objects, thereby exposing workers to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344245030.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.