Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROMERO WOOD

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROMERO WOOD in 513 E. SUMNER ST., HARTFORD, WI 53027 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344245030.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Romero Wood — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Romero Wood is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROMERO WOOD
Site address
513 E. SUMNER ST.
City
HARTFORD
State
WI
ZIP
53027
Mailing
530 W. GREENFIELD AVE., MILWAUKEE, WI 53204
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Abate by
Nov 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a)  The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building, thereby exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building, thereby exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure a ladder used for access was at least 3 feet above the landing surface, exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure an adequate ladder was used for access. Workers were using a step ladder in the closed position for access, thereby exposing workers to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(12): Ladders used where the employee or the ladder could contact exposed energized electrical equipment did not have nonconductive side rails:  (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure a ladder with nonconductive side rails was used near an energized power line, thereby exposing workers to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) At the worksite located at 513 E. Sumner St., Hartford, WI, the employer did not ensure workers were using head protection when exposed to overhead objects, thereby exposing workers to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344245030.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.