Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HECTOR AYALA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HECTOR AYALA in 233 HWY 3009, SCHERTZ, TX 78154 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344248695.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hector Ayala — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hector Ayala is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HECTOR AYALA
Site address
233 HWY 3009
City
SCHERTZ
State
TX
ZIP
78154
Mailing
6023 BROOK LEA, HOUSTON, TX 77087
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about August 21, 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were  protected from head injuries from falling objects or material. Employees were working below other employees installing stucco and were not wearing hard hats. Employees exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Abate by
Sep 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  On or about August 21 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were protected from a fall hazard. The scaffold was erected to install stucco. The workers were climbing the scaffolding to ascend and descend the scaffolding.  Employees exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet and 6 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Abate by
Sep 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:  On or about August 21 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were protected from a fall hazard. The scaffold was erected to install stucco. The fronts and the ends of the scaffolding were not protected with mid rails or top rails. Employees exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet and 6 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Abate by
Sep 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights:  On or about August 21 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were protected from a fall hazard. The scaffold was erected to install stucco. The working level of scaffolding was not fully planked. Employees exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12 feet and 6 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Abate by
Sep 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  On or about August 21 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were  protected from a fall hazard. The employees were working from the protruding roof above the windows and they were not protected from a fall. The employees were installing stucco. Employees exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 11 feet and 3 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Abate by
Oct 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  On or about August 21, 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were trained to recognize the hazard and procedures in order to minimize the hazards. Employees were installing stucco and were working at elevated heights. They were not trained in fall protection when working from scaffolding.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2019
Abate by
Oct 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about August 21, 2019, the employer failed to ensure employees were trained to recognize the hazard and procedures in order to minimize the hazards. Employees were installing stucco and were working at elevated heights. They were not trained in fall protection when working from the protruding roof above the windows.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Hector Ayala's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344248695.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.