KENOSHA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: RODRIGO PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RODRIGO PEREZ in 4026 7TH AVENUE, KENOSHA, WI 53140 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344251178.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RODRIGO PEREZ
- Site address
- 4026 7TH AVENUE
- City
- KENOSHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53140
- Mailing
- 2518 17TH STREET, RACINE, WI 53405
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Employees conducting roofing activities on a roof with a 8:12 pitch were not protected from falling to the lower level. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 21 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 28, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) The portable ladder being used for access to the roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing area.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344251178.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.