BIDDEFORD, ME —
OSHA Inspection: ELM STREET VAULT INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ELM STREET VAULT INC. in 38 LANDRY STREET, BIDDEFORD, ME 04005 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 344251954.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELM STREET VAULT INC.
- Site address
- 38 LANDRY STREET
- City
- BIDDEFORD
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04005
- Mailing
- 38 LANDRY STREET, BIDDEFORD, ME 04005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327390
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,137 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Shop - A workplace hazard assessment had not been conducted for tasks conducted in the shop.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1136.5
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye and face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment: Shop - The Employer did not require the use of protective eye and face equipment while employees were mixing and pouring wet concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.135 A01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects: Shop - Employees were not required to wear hard hats while working in areas where cranes were operating
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,421 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: Shop - The electrical cord on the VIBCO concrete vibrator had cracks in the outer covering and insulation exposing bare wires.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1421
- — Z (S) $2842
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,137 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Facility - The Employer did not maintain a written hazard communication program which describes how the training, labeling, and safety data sheet, requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200 will be met.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1136.5
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Oct 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): Facility - The Employer did not certify that each powered industrial truck operator had been trained and evaluated as required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at ELM Street Vault INC.
View ELM Street Vault INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327390)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344251954.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.