Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANSICO GARCIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANSICO GARCIA in 1044 WALDEN CT., BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344254362.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fransico Garcia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fransico Garcia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FRANSICO GARCIA
Site address
1044 WALDEN CT.
City
BOLINGBROOK
State
IL
ZIP
60440
Mailing
4042 S. ALBANY AVE., CHICAGO, IL 60632
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $325 · Current $325
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a. On or about January 22, 2020 - the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected:  Citation Number                Item Number            Abatement Date 02                                    001                           12/18/2019
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $325

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $3,410
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a.  On or about August 21, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee working on the ground, below roofing activities, was not wearing a hard hat to protect against falling materials and debris.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a.  On or about August 21, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, employees using pneumatic nail guns did not wear safety glasses, thereby exposing employees to the hazards associated with eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a.  On or about August 21, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, employees performing residential roofing operations, eighteen (18) feet inches above the ground, were not protected from falls, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 30, 2019
Abate by
Dec 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a.  On or about August 21, 2019, at the above addressed jobsite, employees had been provided fall protection training, however, the employer failed to keep a written certification of record.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344254362.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.