Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SAFARI ENTERPRISES, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SAFARI ENTERPRISES, LLC in 3725 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR, MARIANNA, FL 32446 (NAICS 336411). OSHA activity number 344263280.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Safari Enterprises, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Safari Enterprises, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3725 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR
City
MARIANNA
State
FL
ZIP
32446
Mailing
3725 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR, MARIANNA, FL 32446
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336411
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a. On or about August 19, 2019, in the manufacturing area, the employer failed to implement a written Respiratory Protection Program for the protection of employees required to use a respirator when grinding and painting.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about August 19, 2019, in the manufacturing area, the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation to employees, prior to their first use of respirators they were required to use when grinding or painting metal parts.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about August 19, 2019, in the manufacturing area, the employer failed to ensure that employees required to use a tight-fit respirator when grinding and painting passed a qualitative or quantitative fit test to ensure they are provided appropriate level of protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  On or about August 19, 2019, in the manufacturing area, the employer failed to implement an annual Respiratory Protection training program for the protection of employees required to use a respirator when grinding or painting.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) On or about August 19, 2019, in the general fabrication area, the employer failed to develop, implement and maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for the protection of the employees using hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to Norox MEKP-925, Acetylene, Polynt-943 and Carbon Steel electrodes.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  a) On or about August 19, 2019, in the general manufacturing area, the employer failed to create a list of all hazardous chemicals used and stored in the workplace, including but not limited to Norox MEKP-925, Acetylene, Polynt-943 and Carbon Steel electrodes
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  a) On or about August 19, 2019, in the general fabrication area, the employer failed to keep a copy of the Safety Data Sheets of the chemicals used and stores in the workplace available to employees using hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to  Norox MEKP-925, Acetylene, Polynt-943 and Carbon Steel electrodes..
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) On or about August 19, 2019, in the general fabrication area, the employer failed to provide Hazard Communication training to employees using hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to Norox MEKP-925, Acetylene, Polynt-943 and Carbon Steel electrodes.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344263280.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.