Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FROST USED AUTO PARTS LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FROST USED AUTO PARTS LLC in 2307 SOUTH HWY 31, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507 (NAICS 423140). OSHA activity number 344266689.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frost Used Auto Parts LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frost Used Auto Parts LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2307 SOUTH HWY 31
City
BAY MINETTE
State
AL
ZIP
36507
Mailing
2307 SOUTH HWY 31, BAY MINETTE, AL 36507
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423140
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.135 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2019
Abate by
Nov 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects:  a) Outside shop area; on August 28, 2019 and times prior the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards by requiring employees to enter the parts storage area around the collapsed roof without head protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2019
Abate by
Nov 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:  a) Facility; on August 28, 2019 and times prior the employer exposed employees to struck by hazards by allowing employees to operate the Nasco forklift with leaking hydraulic lines.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2019
Abate by
Nov 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Facility; on August 28, 2019 and times prior the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that he did not provide a written Hazardous Communication Program in order to protect employees from hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, oil, grease, fuels, and antifreeze.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2019
Abate by
Nov 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Facility; on August 28, 2019 and times prior the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that he did not provide training as part of a written Hazardous Communication Program in order to protect employees from hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, oil, grease, fuels, and antifreeze.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2019
Abate by
Nov 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  a) Facility; on August 28, 2019 and times prior the employer failed to document a hazard assessment of the site and operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344266689.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.