Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CONTEMPORARY MACHINEREY AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CONTEMPORARY MACHINEREY AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. in 551 ROBERTS RD, FLAGLER BEACH, FL 32136 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 344272737.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Contemporary Machinerey and Engineering Services, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Contemporary Machinerey and Engineering Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
551 ROBERTS RD
City
FLAGLER BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32136
Mailing
551 ROBERTS RD, FLAGLER BEACH, FL 32136
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Jan 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling:   a. On or about August 29, 2019,in the in the general manufacturing area, employees were not protected from falling 7 feet into the Farrel-Sellers milling machine pit's open edge.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2386.8
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.335 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Jan 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $3,182 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(b)(1): Safety signs, safety symbols, or accident prevention tags were not used where necessary to warn employees about electrical hazards which may endanger them:   a. On or about August 29, 2019, the electrical panel of a locomotive's electric traction motor unit located in the general manufacturing area, was not marked by safety signs, safety symbols or accident prevention tags to warn employees of the electrical hazards presented by the panel metal parts energized with 480 VAC while being tested for function, adjusted and programmed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3182.4
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.335 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Jan 27, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(b)(2): Barricades were not used in conjunction with safety signs where it was necessary to prevent or limit employee access to work areas in which employees were exposed to uninsulated energized conductors or circuit parts:  a. On or about August 29, 2019, the electrical panel of a locomotive's electric traction motor unit located in the general manufacturing area, was not barricaded, in conjunction with safety signs, to limit the employees' access to the electrical hazards presented by the panel metal parts energized with 480 VAC while being tested for function, adjusted and programmed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a. On or about August 29, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to implement a written Respiratory Protection program for employees required to use a respirator when conducting painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:.  a. On or about August 29, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to provide a medical evaluation to employees, prior to their first use of respirators they were required to use respirator when conducting painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a. On or about August 29, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to ensure that employees required to use a tight-fit respirator when conducting painting operations passed a qualitative or quantitative fit test to ensure they are provided appropriate level of protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators:  a. On or about August 29, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to ensure that Respiratory Protection training was provided to the employees required to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  a. On or about August 29, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to evaluate the performance of each forklift operator at least every 3 years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.253 B04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet:  a. On or about August 20, 2018, in the welding area, the employer did not ensure that an oxygen and an Acetylene cylinders were stored separate by a minimum distance of twenty feet (20') or a five feet (5') high barrier with a fire-resistance rating of one-half hour.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1): Conductors entering boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasions:  a. On or about August 29, 2019, next to the East wall of the building, the 480 VAC electrical cables entering the junction box of the motor of a "Racine" hydraulic pump were not protected from abrasions, exposing employees to potential contact energized electrical parts in case a fault occurs if the cables' insulation is damaged by the edge of the box's hole as the conductors enter the box.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. On or about August 29, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to the employer failed to develop, implement and maintain a written Hazard Communication Program for the protection of the employees using hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to "Ben's Paint Supply Lacquer Thinner", Benjamin Moore Super-Spec", "Sherwin-Williams Industrial Enamel", "ZEP Zepreserve" and compress gasses such as Oxygen and Acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2019
Abate by
Feb 18, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  a. On or about August 29, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer failed to compile a list of all hazardous chemicals stored and used throughout the workplace, including but not limited to "Ben's Paint Supply Lacquer Thinner", Benjamin Moore Super-Spec", "Sherwin-Williams Industrial Enamel", "ZEP Zepreserve" and compress gasses such as Oxygen and Acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344272737.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.