Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: R.E.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of R.E.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 90 INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE, LINCOLN, RI 02865 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 344279658.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R.E.C. Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R.E.C. Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
90 INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE
City
LINCOLN
State
RI
ZIP
02865
Mailing
22 LEAH STREET, JOHNSTON, RI 02919
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)   (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that each employee that was required to use a respirator for work activities such as cutting concrete, was medically evaluated prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face-piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (Construction Reference 1926.103)   (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that an employee using a respirator while cutting concrete was fit tested prior to using the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that ensured that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of at least the following elements: Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator; What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are; How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions; How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator; What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that each employee required to use a respirator received the necessary training on the use, care and storage of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program, where employee work activities included the potential exposure to crystalline silica, from dry-cutting concrete, as well as cement and fuel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that the cut-off-saw was used with an integrated water delivery system that continuously feeds water to the blade to minimize an employee exposure to crystalline silica dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that an assessment of each employee exposed to crystalline silica while cutting concrete at 90 Industrial Circle, Lincoln RI, was performed to determine if the exposure was at or above the action level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(2): Where respirator use is required by this section, the employer did not institute a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for the required use of respirators by employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that a written exposure control plan was developed and implemented regarding the potential exposure to crystalline silica to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 H01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(h)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who was required under this section to use a respirator for 30 or more days per year:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that medical surveillance was provided to employees who are required to utilize a respirator for 30 or more days per year.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 I02 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Nov 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 9/3/2019, the employer did not ensure that employees received training on the potential hazards of exposure to crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View R.E.C. Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344279658.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.