Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICARDOS CONSTRUCTION INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of RICARDOS CONSTRUCTION INC. in 30-32 CENTRE ST., CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344292255.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ricardos Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ricardos Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
30-32 CENTRE ST.
City
CONCORD
State
NH
ZIP
03301
Mailing
23 E. BRATTLES ST. APT- C, BROCKTON, MA 02301
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 15, 2019
Abate by
Jan 6, 2020
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.    The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 7, 2019.  b.    The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 7, 2019.   c.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 7, 2019.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a. Site - Employees performing roofing work were not protected from falls of approximately 25 feet while sitting atop the roofs peak, distributing shingles, without the use of fall protection.  b. Site - Employees performing roofing work were not protected from falls of approximately 25 feet when body belts attached to lifelines were used in lieu of one of the acceptable forms of protection noted above.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a. Site - a. Site - The employer did not provide employees with a training program which would allow them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a. Site - An aluminum extension ladder used by employees to gain access to and from the roof was positioned against the top of a window dormer and was only extended approximately 6 inches above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344292255.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.