MANCHESTER, NH —
OSHA Inspection: SEGUNDO GUAMAN
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SEGUNDO GUAMAN in 90 GARDEN DRIVE, MANCHESTER, NH 03102 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344294970.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SEGUNDO GUAMAN
- Site address
- 90 GARDEN DRIVE
- City
- MANCHESTER
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03102
- Mailing
- 115 HARVARD STREET, BROCKTON, MA 02301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 15, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 4, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: a. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 10, 2019.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Location: site On or about 9/10/19, the employer did not provide fall protection training to employees exposed to fall hazards while working on a roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $7,956 · Current $7,956
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Location: roof On or about 9/10/19, the employer did not ensure employees working on a roof more than 6 feet above a lower level were protected from falling. Segundo Guaman dba STG roofing was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1321614, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 08/08/18, with respect to a workplace located at 14 Linlew DR. Derry, NH 03038
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $7956
More inspections at Segundo Guaman
View Segundo Guaman's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344294970.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.