BELLEVUE, PA —
OSHA Inspection: ALEXANDER HOME IMPROVEMENT
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALEXANDER HOME IMPROVEMENT in ACROSS FROM 334 RIVERVIEW AVENUE, BELLEVUE, PA 15202 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344297478.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALEXANDER HOME IMPROVEMENT
- Site address
- ACROSS FROM 334 RIVERVIEW AVENUE
- City
- BELLEVUE
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15202
- Mailing
- 1801 DEVONSHIRE ROAD, CORAOPOLIS, PA 15108
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $865 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Job site, across the street from 334 Riverview Avenue, Bellevue, PA: On or about September 6, 2019, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee on ground level below employees on the roof wore protective head wear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $865
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) Job site, across the street from 334 Riverview Avenue, Bellevue, PA: On or about September 6, 2019, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee used appropriate eye/face protection while cutting with a power saw, in that he did not wear any such protection at all.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A02
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there was a hazard from flying objects: a) Job site, across the street from 334 Riverview Avenue, Bellevue, PA: On or about September 6, 2019, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that an employee used appropriate eye/face protection while using a nail gun in that he wore safety glasses, but they did not have side shields.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,420 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure: a) Job site, across the street from 334 Riverview Avenue, Bellevue, PA: On or about September 6, 2019, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that employees used appropriate fall protection systems/devices where exposed to fall hazards of up to at least approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1420
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $865 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a) Job site, across the street from 334 Riverview Avenue, Bellevue, PA: On or about September 6, 2019, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that the ladder used to get on/off the roof extended the roof line at least 3 feet in that it only extended the roofline approximately 2 1/2 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $865
- — Z (S) $1705
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344297478.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.