Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NICK LETTERS HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NICK LETTERS HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC in 1148 FREEPORT ROAD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15238 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344304050.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nick Letters Home Improvement LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nick Letters Home Improvement LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1148 FREEPORT ROAD
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15238
Mailing
3700 SAXONBURG BOULEVARD, PITTSBURGH, PA 15238
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:      a) Job site, 1148 Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about September 11, 2019, during roofing work, the employer did not ensure that employees used appropriate eye/face protection while operating nail guns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1100
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface were not used:      a) Job site, 1148 Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about September 11, 2019, during roofing work, the employer did not ensure that a safe means of access/egress was provided on a scaffold jack scaffold in that employees climbed over the pick to get up/down, exposing them to a fall hazard of up to at least 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platform heights exceeded 20 feet:    a) Job site, 1148 Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about September 11, 2019, during roofing work, the employer did not ensure that a scaffold jack platform was kept under 20 feet in height.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2019
Abate by
Oct 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    a) Job site, 1148 Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about September 11, 2019, during roofing work, the employer did not ensure that employees working on a ladder jack scaffold were provided with proper safety training. Concerns noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to, platform height was over 20 feet and no safe access was provided to get on/off the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,440 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system, or on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width by the use of a safety monitoring system alone:       a) Job site, 1148 Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about September 11, 2019, during roofing work, the employer did not ensure that appropriate fall protection systems/devices were in use on a low sloped roof, exposing them to a fall hazard of up to at least 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   a) Job site, 1148 Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about September 11, 2019, during roofing work, the employer did not ensure that appropriate fall protection systems/devices were in use on a steep pitched roof, exposing them to a fall hazard of up to at least 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:   a) Job site, 1148 Freeport Road, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about September 11, 2019, during roofing work, the employer did not ensure that the ladder used to get on/off the roof was properly extended above the roofline in that it was only raised about 1 foot above the gutter edge of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Nick Letters Home Improvement LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344304050.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.