Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MAVIS SOUTHEAST, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAVIS SOUTHEAST, LLC in 3750 BLUE RIDGE DR. STE. 200, BUFORD, GA 30519 (NAICS 493190). OSHA activity number 344306618.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mavis Southeast, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mavis Southeast, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3750 BLUE RIDGE DR. STE. 200
City
BUFORD
State
GA
ZIP
30519
Mailing
3750 BLUE RIDGE DR. STE. 200, BUFORD, GA 30519
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493190
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

18 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 31 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $2,695 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: industrial storage rack collapse and struck by hazards:  On or about 9/11/2019 in the warehouse area workers on foot and or operating powered industrial equipment were exposed to struck by and crushing hazards where the loaded industrial storage racks were visibly damaged by powered industrial trucks at locations including but not limited to:  a. Upright between BA 71 B and BA 73 B b. Upright between BA 57 A and BA 55 A c. Stretcher at end of BC d. Stretcher at end of BA e. Upright between BF 64 A and BF 66 A f. Upright between BC 26 A and BC 24 A (Previously unloaded) g. Upright between BA 11 A and BA 13 A h. Upright at AQ 19 i. Upright between AZ 19 A and AZ 21 A j. Upright between AX 54 A and AX 52 A k. Upright between AW 51 A and AW 53 A l. Upright between AV 63 A and AV 65 A m. Upright between AT 55 A and AT 57 A n. Upright at AR 20 A o. Upright at AR 63 A p. Upright between AP 54 A and AP 52 A q. Upright between AP 41 A and AP 39 A r. Upright between AP 46 A and AP 44 A s. Upright between AO 46 A and AO 44 A (Previously unloaded) t. Upright between AM 19 A and AM 21 A u. Upright between AL 34 A and AL 32 A v. Upright between AK 22 A and AK 20 A w. Upright between AJ 26 A and AJ 24 A x. Upright between JA 14 A and JA 12 A y. Upright between AH 19 A and AH 21 A z. Upright between AG 23 A and AG 25 A aa. Upright at AG 39 ab. Upright between AG 66 A and AG 64 A ac. Upright between AF 22 A and AF 20 A ad. Upright between AE 14 A and AF 12 A ae. Upright AD 39  One feasible means of abatement would be to maintain the structural integrity of the installed rack system by assuring proper operational, housekeeping, and maintenance procedures including but not limited to: Regularly inspect for damage. If damage is found, IMMEDIATELY unload the affected area and replace or repair any damaged columns, beams, or other structural components."
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.28 B01 I C

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i)(C): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level is protected from falling by a personal fall protection systems, such as personal fall arrest, travel restraint, or positioning systems:  a. On or about 9/11/2019 throughout the facility employees were exposed to fall hazards of 25- feet while pulling tires from the "E" level where the employer allowed for Turret operators to operate without wearing harnesses.  b. On or about 9/11/2019 at location AC 51 B an employee was observed exposed to fall hazards of five-feet, six-inches to the concrete lower level where he disconnected from his retractable lanyard to enable himself to reach tires that were in the adjacent aisle.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.140 C18

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $10,419 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.140(c)(18): Personal fall protection systems was not inspected before initial use during each work shift for mildew, wear, damage, and other deterioration, and defective components were not removed from service.  On or about 9/11/2019 Throughout the facility workers were exposed to fall hazards of up to 25-feet were the employer failed to require the Turret and Picker operators to inspect their harnesses. During the walkaround inspection there was a harness S/N 1168774, observed in use on Turret 560-14-B21424, that was visibly damaged.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $10419
  • — Z (S) $10419

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $8,335 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  a. On or about 9/11/2019 throughout the facility workers were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to visually identify the locations of the portable fire extinguishers, where workers are expected to fight incipient level fires.  b. On or about 9/11/2019 at aisle BF, workers were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the portable fire extinguisher was blocked by the stored pallets.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $8335
  • — Z (S) $8335

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  On or about 9/11/2019 throughout the facility workers were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to inspect the portable fire extinguishers on a monthly basis since 4/19/2018, where workers are expected to fight incipient level fires. During the walkaround inspection there were noted discrepancies including but not limited to:  a. location BA fire extinguisher damaged b. location BF fire extinguisher blocked by pallets
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  On or about 9/11/2019 throughout the facility workers were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to inspect the portable fire extinguishers on an annual basis since installed on 4/19/2018, where workers are expected to fight incipient level fires. During the walkaround inspection there were noted discrepancies including but not limited to:  a. location BA fire extinguisher damaged b. location BF fire extinguisher blocked by pallets
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage firefighting:  On or about 9/11/2019 throughout the facility workers were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to train the workers on how to use the portable fire extinguishers, where workers are expected to fight incipient level fires.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.176 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,335 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(a): Permanent aisles or passageways were not appropriately marked:  On or about 9/11/2019 throughout the warehouse employees are exposed to struck-by hazards where there are no pedestrian and powered industrial truck separation lines on the floors.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $8335
  • — Z (S) $8335

1910.176 B

Serious Gravity 5 9 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,335 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse:  a . On or about 9/11/2019, throughout the warehouse workers on foot and operating powered industrial trucks in the aisles were exposed to struck by hazards where the employer failed to enforce safe storage of tires that were observed on their edges and a pallet was sticking into the aisle eight -inches at locations including but not limited to:  a. BE 12 B b. BJ 8 C c. BD 52 C d. BC 59 B e. AK 1 C f. AI 1 B g. AH 69 B h. AH 69 B i. AD 24 D j. AO 74 B (Pallet)
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $8335
  • — Z (S) $8335

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,335 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck  The employer failed to train powered industrial truck operators before allowing them to operate at locations including but not limited to:  a. On or about 9/7/2019, at BC 26 / BC 24 an untrained, uncertified, not competent turret operator struck the racks causing severe damage.  b. On or about 9/11/2019 in the parts department forklifts were operated by untrained operators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $8335
  • — Z (S) $8335

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  a) On or about 9/11/2019 and times prior, throughout the facility, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards, in that; when conducting forklift training, the employer failed to provide practical training, and or, evaluate the operators performance.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(B): Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, was not provided to the operator when the operator has been involved in an accident or near-miss incident:  a. On or about 9/11/2019 in the warehouse, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that; refresher training had not been provided to an operator who had struck material storage racks.  b. On or about July 2019 in the warehouse, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that; refresher training had not been provided to an operator who had ran his picker into another picker in the aisle.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 N01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(1): A safe distance of approximately three truck lengths between trucks was not maintained:   a. On or about 9/11/2019 in the warehouse, forklift operators were exposed to struck-by hazards, in that; where narrow aisles were congested, the turret and picker were observed being operated in close proximity to each other.  b. On or about July, 2019 in the warehouse, forklift operators were exposed to struck-by hazards, in that; where narrow aisles were congested, two pickers collided.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.178 N04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $8,335 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(4): Drivers were not required to slow down and sound the horn at cross aisles and other locations where vision is obstructed:  On or about 9/11/2019, throughout the warehouse where the employer failed to enforce the use of horns, workers were observed not sounding their horns while operating powered industrial trucks at times including but not limited to exiting and entering aisles with blocked views at the ends from stacked pallets, exposing foot and pedestrian traffic to struck-by and crushing hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $8335
  • — Z (S) $8335

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,251 · Current $2,695 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:  At locations including but not limited to:  a. On or about 9/11/2019, in the parts department, workers at the workstation were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where the employer used a metallic quad outlet designed for mounting as a pendant.  b. On or about 9/11/2019, in the parts department, workers at the workstation were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where the employer "daisy chained" a relocatable 15A power strip from the improper pendant. The strip was powering two monitors, a copier, and two printers. There was also the availability for the use of personal fans, space heaters, and a vacuum cleaner which would be powered by the same strip.  c. On or about 9/11/2019, in the receiving manager's office area, workers at the workstation were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where the employer used a metallic quad outlet to power the monitors, printers and electrical devices.  d. On or about 9/11/2019, in the receiving manager's office area, workers at the workstation were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where the employer used a metallic quad outlet to power the monitors, printers and electrical devices.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2695.1
  • — C (S) $6251
  • — Z (S) $6251

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  At locations including but not limited to:  a. On or about 9/11/2019, in the parts department, workers at the workstation were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where the employer powered a metallic quad outlet with a flexible cord in lieu of permanent wiring.  b. On or about 9/11/2019, in the receiving manager's office area, workers at the workstation were exposed to electrical shock and burn hazards where the employer powered a metallic quad outlet with a flexible cord in lieu of permanent wiring.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.37 A03

Repeat Gravity 1 4 instances 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $62,513 · Current $50,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  a. On or about 9/11/2019 in the rear of the Parts department by aisle "AC", workers were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to ensure that emergency exits were not blocked.  b. On or about 9/11/2019 in the parts department the exit route along the wall, aisle "A", was blocked with parts and materials. Employees were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to ensure that emergency routes were not blocked.  c. On or about 9/11/2019 Aisle "AB" was blocked with palletized tires preventing rapid egress. Employees were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to ensure that emergency routes were not blocked.  d. On or about 9/11/2019 Aisle "AC" was blocked with palletized tires preventing rapid egress. Employees were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to ensure that emergency routes were not blocked.  Mavis Tire Supply Corporation dba Mavis Discount Tires was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.37(a)(3), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1135880, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 10/11/2016, with respect to a workplace located at 343 South Ave East Westfield, New Jersey 07090.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $50000
  • — C (R) $62513
  • — Z (R) $62513

1910.37 B04

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2019
Abate by
Jan 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $31,257 · Current $20,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent:  On or about 9/11/2019, throughout the facility, employees were exposed to smoke inhalation and burn hazards where the employer failed to ensure there were signs for the direction of travel to the nearest fire exit as the line-of sight to an exit door was not clearly visible. Locations included but were not limited to the parts department.  Mavis Tire Supply Corporation dba Mavis Discount Tires was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910/37(b)(4), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1135880, citation number 1, item number 4 and was affirmed as a final order on 10/11/2016, with respect to a workplace located at 343 South Ave East Westfield, New Jersey 07090.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $20000
  • — C (R) $31257
  • — Z (R) $31257

View Mavis Southeast, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344306618.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.