Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VANESSA RESEARCH HOLDINGS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VANESSA RESEARCH HOLDINGS, INC. in 925 SHERMAN AVENUE, HAMDEN, CT 06514 (NAICS 621511). OSHA activity number 344311717.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vanessa Research Holdings, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vanessa Research Holdings, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
925 SHERMAN AVENUE
City
HAMDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06514
Mailing
925 SHERMAN AVENUE, HAMDEN, CT 06514
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621511
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment(PPE):     Facility: The employer had not conducted Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who was required by this section to use personal protective equipment (PPE).     Facility: The employees required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) were not provided with training and information on Workplace Hazard Assessment for PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $2,150 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met:     Facility: The employer did not establish and implement a site specific written hazard communication program where employees were required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Folin & Ciocalteu's phenol reagent and Barium hydroxide monohydrate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2150
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not comply a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.     Facility: A complete list of the hazardous chemicals used in the workplace with a product identifier was not maintained in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees had  not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area:     Facility: The employees required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Folin & Ciocalteu's phenol reagent and Barium hydroxide monohydrate were not provided with training and information on the chemical hazard communications.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1450 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Apr 1, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $1,620 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1450(e)(1): Where hazardous chemicals were used in the workplace, the employer did not develop and carry out the provisions of a written Chemical Hygiene Plan which was capable of protecting employees from health hazards associated with hazardous chemicals:     Facility: Where employees were required to handle hazardous chemicals in the laboratory, the employer did not have written Chemical Hygiene Plan which was capable of protecting employees from health hazards associated with hazardous chemicals:
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1620
  • — Z (S) $2313

1910.101 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.101(b): "Compressed gases." The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks was not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which was incorporated by reference as specified in Sec. 1910.6. The Section 3.3.1 of the CGA Pamphlet P-1-1965 refers to storing cylinders in accordance with CGA and NFPA standards. The Section 3.7.4.1 states "The compressed gas cylinders in service or in storage shall be secured to prevent them from falling":  Laboratory: The Compressed gas cylinder (UN 3156) containing Biologicals Atmosphere Mixture used for cultures containing Carbon dioxide and balance oxygen was not secured.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who were wearing respirators when such use was not required by the employer:      Laboratory: Each employee voluntarily wearing white filtering face pieces (dust masks) was not provide with the basic advisory information on respirators as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344311717.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.