Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: QUALITY GRANITE AND CARPENTRY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of QUALITY GRANITE AND CARPENTRY, LLC in 78 REGIONAL DR., CONCORD, NH 03301 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344317888.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Quality Granite and Carpentry, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Quality Granite and Carpentry, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
78 REGIONAL DR.
City
CONCORD
State
NH
ZIP
03301
Mailing
78 REGIONAL DR., CONCORD, NH 03301
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $2,700 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards from stone slabs:       Stone Yard Storage Area - On or about September 17, 2019, an employee was working with a forklift operator to remove and replace stone slabs from a storage rack. This employee was exposed to being potentially being crushed by a slab falling.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2700
  • — C (S) $5398
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet were exposed to electrical hazards:    Facility - On or about September 17, 2019, employees performing "spotter duties" were exposed to foot injuries while the employee was required to walk next to the forklift which had an elevated stone slabs and the exposed employee was without adequate foot protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3856
  • — Z (S) $3856

1910.135 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee wears a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects:    Facility - On or about September 17, 2019, employees were exposed to head injuries while performing the "spotter's duty," where the employee was working underneath the elevated forks and load of the forklift during the placement and transporting of the stone slabs.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3856
  • — Z (S) $3856

1910.178 L03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive initial training in accordance with paragraph (l) of this section:      Facility and stone yard area - On or about September 17, 2019, the employer did not provide forklift training to employees who were assigned to operate the Toyota (S/N 80259) forklift.  The employer did not ensure that the employees understood the hazards associated with operating forklift and the means necessary to minimize or eliminate those hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $5398
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.178 M02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $5,398 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): No person shall be allowed to stand or pass under the elevated portion of any truck, whether loaded or empty:    Stone yard area - On or about September 17, 2019, an employee was located and passing under the elevated forklift boom extension while the crew was relocating and placing the stone slab in the A-frame storage racking system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $5398
  • — Z (S) $5398

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition:    Toyota Fork Truck (S/N 80259) - On or about September 17, 2019, the Braxtion-Bragg telescopic pole was used to lift, transport, and lower stone slab loads while the boom was not attached or secured to the forklift. Additionally, the shackle utilize to support the yellow granite slab clamp device was extremely worn.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2000
  • — C (S) $3856
  • — Z (S) $3856

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,856 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service and were placed in service when the examination showed condition(s) that would adversely affect the safety of the vehicle. Examinations were not made at least daily. Where industrial trucks are used on a round-the-clock basis, they were not examined after each shift:     Toyota Fork Truck (S/N 80259) - On or about September 17, 2019, the forklift was not adequately inspected in that the boom extension was not examined prior to being placed in service to ensure that the attachment was adequately attached to the forklift. Additionally, the shackles utilized for connecting and support the granite slab clamping device to the boom extension was extremely worn and not inspected or removed from service frequent use with the forklift.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3856
  • — Z (S) $3856

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2020
Abate by
Mar 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $771 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 and OSHA 300A or equivalent:      Facility - On or about September 17, 2019, the employer failed to establish a system of recording employees work related fatalities, injuries and illnesses, in that the OSHA 300 logs were not kept at the establishment.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $771
  • — Z (O) $771

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344317888.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.