CUMMING, GA —
OSHA Inspection: RP FRAMING CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RP FRAMING CONSTRUCTION INC. in 6315 PRIVET WAY LOT 27, CUMMING, GA 30028 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344323761.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RP FRAMING CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 6315 PRIVET WAY LOT 27
- City
- CUMMING
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30028
- Mailing
- 995 EAGLE POINT DRIVE, LAWRENCEVILLE, GA 30044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,470 · Current $3,470
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: a) Employees performing roofing work were exposed to struck-by hazards from wood chips and nails while operating Hitachi nail guns without wearing eye protection. b) Am employee performing roofing work was exposed to struck-by hazards from wood chips and saw dust while cutting wood with a Hilti WSC 7.25-S circular saw while not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3470
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about September 19, 2019, at Lot 27, 6315 Privet Way, Cumming, Georgia: Employees performing framing work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25-feet and greater when they worked from the trusses of the house without using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.502 D16
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16): 1926.502(d)(16): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could neither free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m), nor contact any lower level: Employees performing framing work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25-feet and greater when they tied their life lines to the d-ring in the center of their backs to use as fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee: On or about September 19, 2019, at Lot 27, 6315 Privet Way, Cumming, Georgia: Employees performing framing work were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25-feet and greater when they tied ropes around a truss to use as their fall protection anchor.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about September 19, 2019, at Lot 27, 6315 Privet Way, Cumming, Georgia: Employees performing framing work were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10-feet when they used one half of an aluminum extension ladder that did not extend three feet above the 2nd floor landing to move to and from the ground level to 2nd floor level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Mar 12, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: On or about September 19, 2019, at Lot 27, 6315 Privet Way, Cumming, Georgia: An employee performing framing work was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 4-feet when he worked from a 6- foot fiberglass a-frame ladder that was not opened and leaned against the side of the house.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344323761.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.