FAYETTEVILLE, AR —
OSHA Inspection: REX ALLEN GASH
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of REX ALLEN GASH in 5838 W MECKLIN ST, FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344324140.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- REX ALLEN GASH
- Site address
- 5838 W MECKLIN ST
- City
- FAYETTEVILLE
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72701
- Mailing
- 2453 SARA ALICE CT., FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $1,447 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) At the construction site, employees framing a residential home were not protected from being struck-by nails or other materials.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1447
- — Z (S) $2892
1926.300 B01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $1,447 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use: (a) At the construction site, employees framing a residential home were not protected from amputation hazards, due to the guard on a Makita 7 1/4 circular saw was wedged open.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1447
- — Z (S) $2892
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,154 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: (a) At the construction site, employees framing a residential home were expose to electrical hazards, due to an electrical cord that was connected to the circular saw did not provide for strain relief.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1154
- — Z (S) $2313
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $2,025 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) At the construction site, employees framing a residential home, more than 6 feet above the ground, were not protected from falling by any type of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2025
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 16, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $1,447 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) At the construction site, employees framing a residential home, more than 6 feet above the ground, were not protected from falling, due to the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1447
- — Z (S) $2892
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344324140.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.