Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MG SIDING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MG SIDING, INC. in 230-234 BURLINGTON AVE., WILMINGTON, MA 01887 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 344329933.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MG Siding, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MG Siding, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MG SIDING, INC.
Site address
230-234 BURLINGTON AVE.
City
WILMINGTON
State
MA
ZIP
01887
Mailing
170 BEAVER STREET, APT. #2, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $938 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, a competent person did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $937.5
  • — C (S) $1875
  • — Z (S) $1875

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, the two pump-jack scaffolds and their components were not inspected by a competent person prior to use. Employees were exposed to falls and/or structural failure/collapse.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4376
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, the two pump-jack scaffolds were not erected or altered by trained employees under the direction of a competent person Employees were exposed to falls and/or structural failure/collapse.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $2,188 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, the employee working on the ground below the work on the pump-jack scaffolds and exposed to dropped/falling objects was not wearing head protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2188
  • — C (S) $4376
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2): Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section:  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, the employee working below the elevated platforms of the pump-jack scaffolds was not protected from falling objects by means of barricading, toeboards, screening or canopies.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Jobsite:  On or about September 20, 2019, employees working from the elevated platforms of the pump-jack scaffolds were not protected from falls of 15-24 feet to lower levels.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4376
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.451 B05 II

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $2,188 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end.   Jobsite:   1)  On or about September 20, 2019, the cantilevered ends, of the 24ft scaffold pic, extended approximately 8ft and 7ft beyond the supports on the left and right sides respectively. Employees were exposed to structural failure, collapse and resulting falls.  2) On or about September 20, 2019, the cantilevered left end, of the 12ft scaffold pic, extended approximately 2ft beyond the supports on the left side. Employees were exposed to structural failure, collapse and resulting falls.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2188
  • — C (S) $4376
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,126 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  Jobsite:   1) On or about September 20, 2019, the support poles for the pump-jack scaffold on the left side of the house were set directly on the ground without base plates or mud sills exposing employees to collapse and fall hazards.  2) On or about September 20, 2019, the support poles for the pump-jack scaffold at the front of the house were set directly on the ground, without base plates or mud sills exposing employees to collapse and fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3126
  • — Z (S) $3126

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, the poles of the pump-jack scaffolds were not secured at the bottom by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent..
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 29, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,126 · Current $1,563 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, employees working from the elevated platforms of the pump-jack scaffolds were not trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize hazards associated with pump-jack scaffolds and the procedure to control or minimize them..
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1563
  • — C (S) $3126
  • — Z (S) $3126

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Abate by
Jan 29, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.   Jobsite:  On or about September 20, 2019, employees using ladders as access to scaffold platforms and to install siding were not trained recognize hazards associated ladders and the procedure to control or minimize them.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,126 · Current $1,563 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, the 28ft aluminum extension ladder used by the foreman to access the elevated platform of the pump-jack scaffold did not extend 3ft beyond the platform.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1563
  • — C (S) $3126
  • — Z (S) $3126

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2020
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  Jobsite:   On or about September 20, 2019, the unopened 6ft fiberglass step ladder used by the employee to install vinyl siding at higher levels was used according to its design.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1875
  • — Z (S) $1875

View MG Siding, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344329933.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.