FAIRFIELD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MS REMODELING, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MS REMODELING, LLC in 85 RHODA AVENUE, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 344330980.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MS REMODELING, LLC
- Site address
- 85 RHODA AVENUE
- City
- FAIRFIELD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06824
- Mailing
- 16 CEDAR LANE, MONROE, CT 06468
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- May 18, 2020
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $325 · Current $325
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 85 Rhoda Avenue, Fairfield, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b with a final order date of April 14, 2020 was not received within 10 calendar days (by April 23, 2020) following the abatement due date (April 13, 2020).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $325
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provided for an alternative fall protection: Jobsite: The employee conducting siding operations from the 4 feet wide and 10 feet long balcony platform was not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 19 feet to the ground by the use of appropriate fall protection system and/or device.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 18, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employee exposed to fall hazards while conducting siding operations from the balcony platform was not provided with training and information to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to follow to minimize and/or eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344330980.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.