NORWALK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: THE SHOREHAVEN GOLF CLUB, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of THE SHOREHAVEN GOLF CLUB, INC. in 14 CANFIELD AVENUE, NORWALK, CT 06855 (NAICS 713910). OSHA activity number 344346945.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE SHOREHAVEN GOLF CLUB, INC.
- Site address
- 14 CANFIELD AVENUE
- City
- NORWALK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06855
- Mailing
- 14 CANFIELD AVENUE, NORWALK, CT 06855
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 713910
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2020
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $757 · Current $379 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 14 Canfield Avenue, Norwalk, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001a; Citation 01, Item 001b; and Citation 01, Item 002b with a final order date of March 11, 2020 was not received within 10 calendar days (by May 25, 2020) following the abatement due date (May 15, 2020).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $378.5
- — Z (O) $757
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2020
- Abate by
- May 15, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $3,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not conduct a Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for employees.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3300
- — Z (S) $4048
1910.132 F01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2020
- Abate by
- May 15, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee required to use Personal Protective Equipment that covered when PPE was necessary, what PPE was necessary, how to don, doff, adjust and wear PPE, the limitations of PPE and the proper care, maintenance, useful life and disposal of the PPE: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer had not provided employees required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) with the training and information in the PPE hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2020
- Abate by
- May 15, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $3,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not develop and implement a written Hazard Communication program where employees were required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Chef Master Professional Butane Fuel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3300
- — Z (S) $4048
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2020
- Abate by
- May 15, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard that the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. Information and training was not designed to cover all applicable categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did provide training and information on Hazard Communication where employees were required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Chef Master Professional Butane Fuel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Feb 14, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer failed to report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, within (24) twenty-four hours: ESTABLISHMENT: The employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization of an employee as a result of a work related incident within twenty-four (24) hours to OSHA.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3800
- — Z (O) $5000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 713910)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344346945.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.