AUGUSTA, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: KENNEBEC VALLEY FAMILY DENTISTRY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KENNEBEC VALLEY FAMILY DENTISTRY in 6 EAST CHESTNUT SUITE 420 BALLARD CENTER, AUGUSTA, ME 04330 (NAICS 621210). OSHA activity number 344349881.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KENNEBEC VALLEY FAMILY DENTISTRY
- Site address
- 6 EAST CHESTNUT SUITE 420 BALLARD CENTER
- City
- AUGUSTA
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04330
- Mailing
- 6 EAST CHESTNUT SUITE 420 BALLARD CENTER, AUGUSTA, ME 04330
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621210
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1030 C01 II B
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,122 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(ii)(B): The Exposure Control Plan did not contain effective information regarding the schedule and method of implementation for paragraphs (f) Post-Exposure Evaluation and Follow-up: Establishment - The employer's Exposure Control Plan did not contain information regarding the necessity for immediate Post-Exposure Evaluation and Follow-up testing for the source and the employee involved in a needlestick incident.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $2121.6
- · C (S) $5304
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.1030 F03
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(3): Following a report of an exposure incident, the employer did not make immediately available to the exposed employee a confidential medical evaluation or follow-up: Establishment - The employer did not immediately make available a medical evaluation to an employee who potentially was exposed to a bloodborne pathogen from a needlestick injury.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,122 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2): The employer did not effectively train each employee with occupational exposure in accordance with the requirements of this section: Establishment - The employer did not effectively train employees with occupational exposure about the current requirement to have a post exposure evaluation and follow-up after a needlestick incident.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $2121.6
- · C (S) $5304
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,220 · Current $1,288 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not effectively maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Establishment - The employer did not effectively maintain the workplace written hazard communication program including, but not limited to, the updated global harmonization description of the sections of a safety data sheet and pictograms.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1288
- · C (S) $3220
- · Z (S) $3220
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Dec 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Establishment - The employer did not provide effective information and training to employees that use hazardous chemicals prior to their initial work assignment.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621210)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344349881.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.