CEDAR PARK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: URIEL CASTILLO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of URIEL CASTILLO in 2916 ZELMA DR., CEDAR PARK, TX 78613 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344367719.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- URIEL CASTILLO
- Site address
- 2916 ZELMA DR.
- City
- CEDAR PARK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78613
- Mailing
- 342 LACY DR., ELGIN, TX 78621
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. On or about October 9, 2019, employees were using pneumatic nail guns to secure the shingles to the roof of the two story residential home under construction without eye protection, exposing employees to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems nor was an alternative fall protection plan which meets the requirements of 1926.502(k) developed and implemented: On or about May 17, 2019, employees were conducting roofing operations on the residential two story home under construction up to approximately 22 feet high without fall protection, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about October 9, 2019, the employer did not provide a training program for all employees exposed to fall hazards. The program shall include training and instruction in the following areas: a) The recognition and identification of fall hazards in the work area; b) The use and operation of guardrail systems (including perimeter safety cable systems), personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems, fall restraint systems, safety net systems, and other protection to be used; c) The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used; d) The procedures to be followed to prevent falls to lower levels and through or into holes and openings in walking/working surfaces and walls; and e) The fall protection requirements of this subpart.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 11, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: On or about October 9, 2019, employees were performing roofing work on the two story residential home under construction up to approximately 22 feet high using an extension ladder to access the roof that did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1705
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344367719.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.