BRIDGEPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: COUNTY MARKING COMPANY, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of COUNTY MARKING COMPANY, INC. in 1188 MAIN STREET, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344371703.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COUNTY MARKING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 1188 MAIN STREET
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06604
- Mailing
- 51 BROWN PLACE, HARRISON, NY 10528
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,453 · Current $3,200 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing, and medical evaluations. WORKSITE: The employer had not established and implemented a worksite specific written respiratory protection program and procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, and medical evaluations where an employee was required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during tasks, such as (but not limited to) concrete sawing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3200
- — Z (S) $4453
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii). WORKSITE: The employer did not ensure through providing training and performing evaluation that the employee required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) concrete sawing obtained minimum knowledge, skills and other items listed in section (i) through (vii) of this section.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $3,817 · Current $2,400 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator before the employee was required to use the respirator in the workplace. WORKSITE: The employee required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) concrete sawing had not been medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to wear respirators prior to fit test or require to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2400
- — Z (S) $3817
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a tight-fitting face piece respirator were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator. WORKSITE: The employer did not ensure that the employee required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) concrete sawing was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,453 · Current $3,200 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1: WORKSITE: The employer had not fully and properly implemented the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection for the employee required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the concrete sawing task.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3200
- — Z (S) $4453
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,453 · Current $3,200 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or might reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section. WORKSITE: The employer had not assessed the exposure for the employee who was or might reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level during the tasks, such as (but not limited to) concrete sawing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3200
- — Z (S) $4453
More inspections at County Marking Company, INC.
View County Marking Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344371703.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.