Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BAY MARITIME GROUP

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other health inspection of BAY MARITIME GROUP in 310 WEST CUTTING BLVD., RICHMOND, CA 94804 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 344372727.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BAY Maritime Group — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BAY Maritime Group is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BAY MARITIME GROUP
Site address
310 WEST CUTTING BLVD.
City
RICHMOND
State
CA
ZIP
94804
Mailing
310 WEST CUTTING BLVD., RICHMOND, CA 94804
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
46
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2019
Abate by
Oct 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,683 · Current $5,683
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   Boat Yard:  Employees required to wear N95 respirators to protect against health hazards associated with organic vapors and paint dust generated when sanding or painting vessels had facial hair preventing a proper seal.  Employees are exposed to inhalation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5683
  • — Z (S) $5683

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2019
Abate by
Nov 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,683 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:       Respiratory Protection Program:  The employer requires employees to don 3M N95, 3M Cool Flow (MD. # 7502) half-face and 3M Ultimate FX full face, tight-fitting respirators to protect against health hazards associated with organic vapors from marine paints and epoxies, and dust generated when grinding or sanding vessel surfaces.  Annual fit testing has not been provided.  Employees are exposed to respiratory health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5683

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2019
Abate by
Nov 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,683 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)        A written hazard communication program was not maintained in the work place for employees using hazardous chemical products such as but not limited to Petit Trinidad marine paints,  International thinner, adhesives, and epoxies.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5683

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2019
Abate by
Nov 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.   Safety data sheets (SDSs) were not obtained to replace material safety data sheets (MSDS's) for hazardous chemical products used in the boatyard such as Petit Trinity marine  paints, International thinner, adhesives and epoxies.  The SDSs need to be available for employees to reference during the work shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2019
Abate by
Nov 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):     Boat Yard:  The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if employees should be required to wear personal protective equipment such as respirators, ear plugs, eye wear, gloves, and safety shoes to protect against excessive noise, flying particles and dust, or inhalation and struck by hazards when grinding, painting or repairing vessels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View BAY Maritime Group's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344372727.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.