Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: BRODY PRINTING COMPANY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRODY PRINTING COMPANY, INC. in 265 CENTRAL AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607 (NAICS 323111). OSHA activity number 344392204.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Brody Printing Company, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brody Printing Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
265 CENTRAL AVENUE
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06607
Mailing
265 CENTRAL AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
323111
Employees
13
Ownership type
Private (A)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    WORKSHOP: The employer had not verified through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2200
  • · Z (S) $3031

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  WORKSHOP: The employer had not provided training and information to the employees required to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) on the workplace hazard assessment for PPE.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(b)(1)(ii): Protective eye devices did not comply with ANSI Z87.1-2003 providing employees appropriate protection when hazards associated with eye injuries were present in their job duties.     WORKSHOP: The employer had not purchased safety glasses complying with American National Standard Institute (ANSI) Z87.1-2003, Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Personal Protection devices.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $3789

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    WORKSHOP: The employer had not established  and implemented step-by-step hazardous energy control lockout/tagout procedures in machine specific, including alternative measures for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) printing presses, folders, and staddle stitcher.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $3789

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:  WORKSHOP: The employees, as "affected and other types" were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lockout/tagout) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the printing presses, folders, and staddle stitcher
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.304 F01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $2,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel:    WORKSHOP: The electrical panels having built-in overcurrent protection devices were blocked with dollies, a pail and three cardboard cylinders for press parts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2700
  • · Z (S) $3789

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program, including the Globalized Harmonized System (GHS) where employees were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) inks, alcohol, oils, greases, and citric acid.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2200
  • · Z (S) $3031

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  WORKSHOP: The employees who were required to work with chemicals, such as (but not limited to) inks, alcohol, oils, greases, and citric acid were not provided with training and information on the chemical hazard communications, including the Globalized Harmonized System (GHS).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1904.33 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.33(a): The OSHA 300 Log, the privacy case list (if one exists), the Annual Summary, and the OSHA 301 Incident Report forms were not saved for five (5) years following the end of the calendar year that these records covered.    ESTABLIAHMENT:  The employer had not maintained the log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300-A), and the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) for the years of 2014 through 2019.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2500
  • · Z (O) $5000

1910.157 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(1): The employer was not responsible for the inspection, maintenance and testing of all portable fire extinguishers in the workplace:  WORKSHOP: The portable carbon 5-pound fire extinguisher was not annually inspected since 2015.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344392204.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.