2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: SUDBURY GRANITE & MARBLE, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SUDBURY GRANITE & MARBLE, INC. in 12 ROSENFELD DR, HOPEDALE, MA 01747 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 344392337.

Watch Sudbury Granite & Marble, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sudbury Granite & Marble, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12 ROSENFELD DR
City
HOPEDALE
State
MA
ZIP
01747
Mailing
12 ROSENFELD DR, HOPEDALE, MA 01747
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423320
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3789.00 · Current $1895.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    In the production area at 12 Rosenfeld Drive Hopedale, MA: On or about 11/1/19, employees polishing countertops were exposed to 52% and 51.5% of the action level (AL) for noise which is equivalent to 88.3 dBA and 87.5 dBA over an 8-hour time-weighted averages (TWA), and the employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program.  Sampling was conducted for 583 and 578 minutes, respectively, and AL adjustment for 10-hour shifts for a 50% dose is 83.4 dBA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1894.5
  • — Z (S) $3789

1910.95 G05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(5)(ii): Where mobile test vans were used to meet the audiometric testing obligation, the employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within 1 year of an employee's first exposure at or above the action level:    In the production area at 12 Rosenfeld Drive Hopedale, MA: On or about 11/1/19, an employee polishing countertops was exposed to 51.5% of the action level (AL) for noise which is 87.5 dBA over an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), and the employer did not obtain a valid baseline audiogram within one year of the employee's first exposure at or above the action level (AL).  Sampling was conducted for 578 minutes and the AL adjustment for 10-hour shifts for a 50% dose is 83.4 dBA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(6): At least annually after obtaining the baseline audiogram, the employer did not obtain a new audiogram for each employee exposed at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels :    In the production area at 12 Rosenfeld Drive Hopedale, MA: On or about 11/1/19, an employee polishing countertops was exposed to 51.5% of the action level (AL) which is equivalent to 88.3 dBA over an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA), and the employer did not obtain a new audiogram at least annually.   Sampling was conducted for 578 minutes and the AL adjustment for 10-hour shifts for a 50% dose is 83.4 dBA.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $1137.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    On or about 11/1/19, an employee polishing countertops voluntarily wore a 3M elastomeric half-face respirator, and the employer did not ensure that the employee was medically able to use the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1136.5
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3789.00 · Current $1895.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:    Shop Area, 12 Rosenfeld Drive Hopedale, MA: On or about 10/18/19, employees were observed using an overhead crane which had not received a complete periodic inspection of the crane in the last 12 months in accordance with the requirements in 1910.179(j)(2) and paragraphs 1910.179(j)(3)(I) through (j)(3)(x).    Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1894.5
  • — Z (S) $3789

1910.1053 F02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $1137.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:    On the shop floor at 12 Rosenfeld Drive Hopedale, MA: On or about 11/1/19, employees were using handheld grinders with water delivery attached, to polish countertops which contained silica, and the employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan for silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1136.5
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  On or about 11/1/19, an employee polishing countertops wore a 3M elastomeric half-face respirator, and was not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344392337.