Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: THE BRITTANY COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE BRITTANY COMPANY, INC. in 193 SOUTH CHERRY STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 344394713.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Brittany Company, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Brittany Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
193 SOUTH CHERRY STREET
City
WALLINGFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06492
Mailing
193 SOUTH CHERRY STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2019
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a site specific hazardous energy control lockout/tagout program consisting of machine specific step-by-step written energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspection for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the turret punch machine and press brakes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1591.1
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2019
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented step-by-step hazardous energy control lockout/tagout procedures in the machine specific, including alternative measures for the employees during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the turret punch machine and press brakes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2019
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees:  WORKSHOP:  The employee, as an "authorized" type was not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of revised energy sources (lo/to) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the turret punch machine and press brakes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2019
Abate by
Jan 8, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not evaluated the performance of the the powered industrial truck (PIT) operators at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1591.1
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not verified through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344394713.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.