OSHA Inspection: MARKIUS ACERO

Issued

2020-04-06 00:00:00

Abate by

2020-05-21 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $325.00 · Current $325.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  b.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  c. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1c nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  d. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  e. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  f. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  g. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  h. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  i. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 6 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  j. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 7 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  k. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 8a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.  l. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 8b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent December 19, 2019.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)  Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(e)(8)(ii): Unless the snaphook is a locking type and designed for the following connections, snaphooks shall not be engaged to each other:  Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where two lifelines used for fall protection were connected to each other on a single anchor point.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(e)(9): Positioning device systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and defective components were not removed from service:  Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where defective positioning device system components including, but not limited to, homemade body belts consisting of web lanyards wrapped around the employee's waist and tied in a knot and anchor points consisting of a single nail being driven through one or two lifelines into the roof ridge were not taken out of service.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  Site- Employees working from the ground were not protected from over head struck by hazards where head protection was not worn.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- An employee working from the roof was not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not utilized.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(e)(1): Positioning device systems were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 2 feet (0.9 m):  Site- An employee working from the roof rake was not protected from bodily injury where their positioning device was not rigged such that they could not free fall more than two feet.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(e)(2): Positioning devices were not secured to an anchorage capable of supporting at least twice the potential impact load of an employee's fall or 3,000 pounds (13.3 kN), whichever was greater:  Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where positioning devices being used for fall protection where not attached to an adequate anchor point. Each of the employee were using a positioning device connected to an anchor point which consisted of a single nail driven through their lifelines and into the roof ridge.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.502(e)(5): Connecting assemblies for positioning device systems did not have a minimum tensile strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN)  Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 18 feet where homemade body belts consisting of web lanyards wrapped around the employee's waist and tied in a knot were used in their positioning device system for fall protection.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-12-04 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Site- Each employee exposed to a fall hazard was not provided with fall protection training from the employer.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed  Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladders did not extend three feet above the landing surface.

Issued

2019-11-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-11-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(10): The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder with more than one support attachment were not placed with the two rails supported equally:  Site- An employee using an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof was not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder was erected where the ladder was leaning with more weight under one of the side rails.