Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MCLANE MIDWEST, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MCLANE MIDWEST, INC. in 3400 E MAIN ST, DANVILLE, IL 61834 (NAICS 541614). OSHA activity number 344403951.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mclane Midwest, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mclane Midwest, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3400 E MAIN ST
City
DANVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
61834
Mailing
3400 E MAIN ST, DANVILLE, IL 61834
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541614
Employees
400
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $6,361 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:     On or about October 11, 2019, the employer permitted the employees to voluntary use half-piece respirators and the employer did not establish and implement a written program that included employee medical evaluations and information on respirator cleaning, maintenance, and storage.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6361
  • — Z (S) $6361

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about October 11, 2019, the employer permitted the employees to voluntary use half-piece respirators and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator and employees wore tight-fitting half mask respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals:    On or about October 11, 2019, the employer permitted the employees to voluntary use half-piece respirators and the employer did not ensure the respirators were stored to prevent contamination from dust.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2020
Abate by
Mar 20, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) through 1910.134(k)(1)(vii):    On or about October 11, 2019, the employer permitted the employees to voluntary use half-piece respirators and the employer did not provide respirator training to ensure each employee had knowledge of the following:  a) Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator;  b) What the limitations and capabilities of the respirator are;  c) How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions;  d) How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator;  e) What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, and f) How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirators.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3000
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2020
Abate by
Feb 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,494 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.     On or about October 11, 2019, an employee working off an elevated platform was exposed to a fall hazard, when cleaning and spray painting vents in the shop.  The Genie scissor lifts gate was tied opened and the employer did not ensure the use of fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13494
  • — Z (S) $13494

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 29, 2020
Abate by
Feb 21, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $13,494
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    On or about October 11, 2019, an employee working off an elevated platform was exposed to a fall hazard, and the employer did not ensure each employee who perform work while on a scaffolding were trained, as necessary, by a competent person.      The training should include, but not limited to:   a)      Explanations of overhead electrical power lines, fall, and falling object hazards;  b)      Procedures for dealing with hazards;  c)      Recognizing and avoiding unsafe conditions in the work setting;  d)      Instructions for correct operation of the lift (including maximum intended load and load capacity);  e)      Demonstrations of the skills and knowledge needed to operate an aerial lift before operating it on the job;  f)       When and how to perform inspections; and g)      Manufacturers requirements.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $13494
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Mclane Midwest, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344403951.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.