Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: IKO MIDWEST INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of IKO MIDWEST INC. in 235 W. SOUTH TEC DRIVE, KANKAKEE, IL 60901 (NAICS 324122). OSHA activity number 344410642.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch IKO Midwest INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for IKO Midwest INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
IKO MIDWEST INC.
Site address
235 W. SOUTH TEC DRIVE
City
KANKAKEE
State
IL
ZIP
60901
Mailing
235 W. SOUTH TEC DRIVE, KANKAKEE, IL 60901
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324122
Employees
115
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B13 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $9,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(13)(i): (13) Work on low-slope roofs. (i) When work is performed less than 6 feet (1.6 m) from the roof edge, the employer must ensure each employee is protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, travel restraint system, or personal fall arrest system.    a.  On or about October 23, 2019, on the hot oil building roof, employees were required to access a valve located approximately three feet six inches (3'6") from the edge of the roof thereby exposing employees of falls of approximately 30 feet when not provided with fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9282
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $9,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a.  On or about October 23, 2019, in the facility, employees were required to perform maintenance on valves which allow for the transfer of hot roofing asphalt flux.  Employees were exposed to hazards including, but not limited to burns, when the employer failed to develop, document and/or utilize procedures when employees were exposed to activities covered under lock out tag out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9282
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 50 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2019
Abate by
Jan 10, 2020
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $9,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that employees acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices:    a.  On or about October 23, 2019, in the facility, employees were required to perform maintenance on activities covered under lock out tag out.  Employees were exposed to hazards including, but not limited to burns, when the employer failed to provide adequate training to ensure the knowledge and skill required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9282
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 115 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2019
Abate by
Dec 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,169 · Current $818 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    a.  On or about October 29, 2019, in the facility, the employer did not verify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $818
  • — Z (O) $1169

View IKO Midwest INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344410642.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.