Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANCES BONILLA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANCES BONILLA in 7553 ATWOOD DRIVE UNIT 89, PICKERINGTON, OH 43147 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344415989.

Watch Frances Bonilla — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frances Bonilla is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FRANCES BONILLA
Site address
7553 ATWOOD DRIVE UNIT 89
City
PICKERINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43147
Mailing
1672 DUXBERRY AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2019
Abate by
Dec 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Accident prevention responsibilities. Such programs shall provide for frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers.  a. On or about October 30, 2019, for the Lot 89 Atwood Drive, Pickerington, Ohio worksite: the employer failed to provide job site inspections were performed by a designated competent person to assure that accident prevention responsibilities and programs necessary to comply with this part, such as fall protection use during roofing work, were initiated. Employees worked without fall protection and were exposed to fall hazards up to 20 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2019
Abate by
Dec 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  a. On or about October 30, 2019, for the Lot 89 Atwood Drive, Pickerington, Ohio worksite: the employer failed to assure that employees performing roofing work, such as installation of underlayment, material staging and drip edge installion, were protected against falling. Employees were not protected by guardrail systems, a safety net system or a personal fall arrest system while performing roofing work. Employees worked without fall protection and were exposed to fall hazards up to and greater than 20 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

LIPPERT

PROVIA

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344415989.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.