KEY WEST, FL —
OSHA Inspection: CONCAM CORPORATION
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of CONCAM CORPORATION in 2319 ROOSEVELT BLVD, KEY WEST, FL 33040 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 344420666.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CONCAM CORPORATION
- Site address
- 2319 ROOSEVELT BLVD
- City
- KEY WEST
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33040
- Mailing
- 1000 MARKET STREET SUITE 300, PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,398 · Current $3,509 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part: At Location: On or about 10/30/2019 and days prior, the employer exposed employees to fall, struck-by, and impalement hazards, in that the employer did not ensure the company's safety and health program was being utilized and put into action at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3508.7
- — Z (S) $5398
1926.28 A
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,503 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer did not require the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions: At Location: On or about 10/30/2019 and days prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that employees were not wearing work boots while operating equipment and walking at a construction site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1503.45
- — Z (S) $2313
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,398 · Current $3,509 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: At Location: On or about 10/30/2019 and days prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by and impalement hazards, in that the employer did not ensure the rebar was equipped with protective covers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3508.7
- — Z (S) $5398
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 3, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,398 · Current $3,509 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Instance 1: On or about 10/30/2019 and days prior, at the hotel the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 20ft, in that employees were working on the 3rd floor deck without having a fall protection system in place. Instance 2: On or about 10/30/2019 and days prior, at the cottages the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 18ft, in that employees were working from the roof trusses without wearing fall protection equipment. Instance 3: On or about 10/30/2019 and days prior, at the cottages the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 8ft, in that employees were cutting lumber near a stairway that did not have any rails erected around the perimeter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3508.7
- — Z (S) $5398
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Mar 17, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,313 · Current $1,503 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: At Cottages: On or about 10/30/2019 and days prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that employees were using a stairway that did not have at least one handrail installed on either side.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1503.45
- — Z (S) $2313
More inspections at Concam Corporation
View Concam Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344420666.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.