Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HANCOCK FOUNDATIONS & FLATWORK

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HANCOCK FOUNDATIONS & FLATWORK in 122 EAST SCIOTO, SAINT JAMES, MO 65559 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 344426812.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hancock Foundations & Flatwork — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hancock Foundations & Flatwork is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
122 EAST SCIOTO
City
SAINT JAMES
State
MO
ZIP
65559
Mailing
P.O. BOX 727, SAINT JAMES, MO 65559
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238110
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2019
Abate by
Dec 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  a. Neither the employer or his employees were instructed on the requirements for hearing protection (1926.101), and noise levels according to duration of exposure that would require the use of hearing protection (1926.52).  (Note: during the inspection the employer would not allow noise measurements of rebar cutting.)  b. Neither the employer or his employees were instructed on how to determine required excavation slopes according to soil types, and how to test for soil type as stated in the OSHA regulation.  (1926.652(b)(2) requires the use of Appendices A and B to determine soil type.  Appendix B states that soil classification shall be in accordance with Appendix A which requires one visual and one manual test (Appendix (c)(2).)  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 22, 2019
Abate by
Dec 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  Safety glasses were not used or required to be used by the employer during use of a cut-off saw with an abrasive blade to cut rebar.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344426812.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.