Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EDUARDO TREJO

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of EDUARDO TREJO in 1964 S. ALAMO, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78215 (NAICS 333992). OSHA activity number 344428453.

Watch Eduardo Trejo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eduardo Trejo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EDUARDO TREJO
Site address
1964 S. ALAMO
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78215
Mailing
7034 ELUSIVE PASS, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78233
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333992
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) AND AS REFERENCED BY THE NOTE CONTAINED IN 1926.602(d):  29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):  Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178.    East side of this commercial building: On or about November 05, 2019, employees were exposed to fall and ejection/crushing hazards, while the forklift operator was not trained and evaluated on the safe operation of a Aerial Lift JLG (Model 460SJ).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:  Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated:  East side of this commercial building: On or about November 05, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while welding on a roof from a Aerial Lift JLG (Model: 460SJ) without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  East side of this commercial building: On or about November, 05, 2019, and at times prior thereto, employees without fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet to the unpaved ground below while welding on a roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344428453.