Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: APOLINAR SALGADO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of APOLINAR SALGADO in 3712-3724 LIEN ROAD, MADISON, WI 53704 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344431119.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Apolinar Salgado — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Apolinar Salgado is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
APOLINAR SALGADO
Site address
3712-3724 LIEN ROAD
City
MADISON
State
WI
ZIP
53704
Mailing
1009 ROBERT STREET, EDGERTON, WI 53534
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 22, 2020
Abate by
Aug 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $325 · Current $325
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   a)  The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 2b and Citation 1 Item 3.  ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $325

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 22, 2020
Abate by
Aug 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $325 · Current $325
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   The employer failed to submit documentation of abatement within 10 days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Item 1.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $325

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2019
Abate by
Dec 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,254 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:     On or about November 5, 2019, employees performing tear-off on an apartment complex rooftop at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2254
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A02 VIII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2019
Abate by
Dec 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,254 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): The employer did not assure that each employee had been trained by a competent person qualified in the standards contained in subpart M:    On or about November 5, 2019, the employees on site were not familiar with the OSHA fall protection standards and the requirements held within.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2254
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2019
Abate by
Dec 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,255 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    On or about November 5, 2019, to access the working level, employees were utilizing a portable metal extension ladder that was not extended three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2255
  • — Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344431119.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.