Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SEGUNDO ACERO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SEGUNDO ACERO in 472 NH-111, HAMPSTEAD, NH 03841 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344436381.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Segundo Acero for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Segundo Acero is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SEGUNDO ACERO
Site address
472 NH-111
City
HAMPSTEAD
State
NH
ZIP
03841
Mailing
26 7TH STREET, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2020
Abate by
May 13, 2020
Penalty
Initial $325 · Current $325
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  a.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent February 25, 2020.  b.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent February 25, 2020.  c.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent February 25, 2020.  d.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent February 25, 2020.  e.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent February 25, 2020.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $325

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site- Employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide for a competent person to conduct frequent and regular inspections of the worksite.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2842

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not required to be worn.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Site- Employees working from the roof were exposed to falls between 9 and 28 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from the roof were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2842

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 15, 2020
Abate by
Jan 22, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site- Employees using a Werner aluminum extension ladder to access the roof were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladder only extend one rung above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344436381.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.