Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COMMERCIAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of COMMERCIAL CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC. in 2705 SAMMONDS RD., PLANT CITY, FL 33563 (NAICS 423320). OSHA activity number 344439104.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Commercial Concrete Products INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Commercial Concrete Products INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2705 SAMMONDS RD.
City
PLANT CITY
State
FL
ZIP
33563
Mailing
2705 SAMMONDS RD., PLANT CITY, FL 33563
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423320
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
May 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $9,446 · Current $5,300 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    a) On or about November 13, 2019, in the vibration table area, an employee working as fabricator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 171.2% (93.8 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 485 minute sampling period. The employer did not have a continuing and effective hearing conservation program.    b) On or about November 13, 2019, in the vibration table area, an employee working as fabricator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 160.5% (93.4 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 486 minute sampling period. The employer did not have a continuing and effective hearing conservation program.    c) On or about November 13, 2019, in the dry pack area, an employee working as fabricator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 160.0% (93.3 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 470 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 10 minute period not sampled. The employer did not have a continuing and effective hearing conservation program.    d) On or about November 13, 2019, in the front saw area, an employee working as fabricator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 144.9% (92.6 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 471 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 9 minute period not sampled. The employer did not have a continuing and effective hearing conservation program.    e) On or about November 13, 2019, in the dry pack area, an employee working as fabricator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 96.74% (89.7 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 467 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 13 minute period not sampled. The employer did not have a continuing and effective hearing conservation program.    f) On or about November 13, 2019, in the vibration table area, an employee working as fabricator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 82.73% (88.6 dBA) of the permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) during the 475 minute sampling period. Zero exposure was assumed for the 5 minute period not sampled. The employer did not have a continuing and effective hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5300
  • — Z (S) $9446

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
May 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:   a) On or about November 12, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards, in that, basic advisory information on N95 respirators that were provided to employees on a voluntary basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
May 7, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):  a) On or about November 12, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer exposed employees to chemicals such as, but not limited to, silica and dust suppressant, in that, employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2020
Abate by
Apr 16, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) On or about November 12, 2019, throughout the facility, the employer exposed employees to chemicals such as, but not limited to, silica and dust suppressant, in that, employer did not provide training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Commercial Concrete Products INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344439104.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.