PASS CHRISTIAN, MS —
OSHA Inspection: RUBY CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUBY CONSTRUCTION in 104 BARKLEY DR., PASS CHRISTIAN, MS 39571 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 344446265.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RUBY CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 104 BARKLEY DR.
- City
- PASS CHRISTIAN
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 39571
- Mailing
- 3109 50TH AVE., GULFPORT, MS 39501
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236115
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $2,892 · Current $2,892
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) South side of house - On or about November 13, 2019 The employer failed to provide head protection for employees working below an employee installing plywood sheeting exposing them to struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2892
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six or more feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or person. (a) West side of house - On or about November 13, 2019 The employer failed to install guard rails along walking surface where employees walk to enter and exit the building exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) Front and south side of house - On or about November 13, 2019 the employer failed to provide fall protection to employees working at heights greater than 6 feet exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $4,048 · Current $4,048
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: (a) Front of house - On or about November 13, 2019 The employer allowed the employees to the stairs to access the house 16 feet high that was not guarded with railings along stairs exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4048
1926.1052 C07
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(7): The top edge of a stairrail system served as a handrail and the height of the top edge was less than 36 inches (91.5 cm) from the upper surface of the stairrail system to the surface of the tread, in line with the face of the riser (a) Front of the house - On or about November 13, 2019 the employer failed to install railing along stairs that lead to upper landing 16 feet high exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $325 · Current $325
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: (a) Front and south side of house - Employees working from heights greater than 6 feet were not using fall protection and did not receive fall protection training exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $325
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions which affect the capacity or safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval: (a) North side of house - On or about November 13, 2019 the employer allowed the employees to make a wooden basket to lift employees up to install plywood siding without the written approval of the lift manufacturer exposing them to struck by and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.602 D
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):Note: The requirements applicable to construction work under paragraph (d) of this section are identical to those set forth at paragraph (l) of 29 CFR 1910.178. EACH 1910 STANDARD USED MUST INCLUDE "AND AS REFERENCED BY THE NOTE CONTAINED IN 1926.602(d)" at the end of the SAVE. (a) North side of house - On or about November 13, 2019 The employer instructed his employee to operate the All-terrain forklift without being trained to operate the lift properly exposing employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. (a) Front and south side of house - On or about November 13, 2019 The employer allowed his employees to use the stairs and use an aluminum ladder without being trained on how to use them safely exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jan 29, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: (a) Throughout the job site - On or about November 13, 2109 the employer failed to provide safety training for his employees exposing them to struck by and fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Ruby Construction
View Ruby Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236115)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344446265.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.