Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CINELLI SCRAP METALS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CINELLI SCRAP METALS, INC. in 275 BROADWAY, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07306 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 344456330.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cinelli Scrap Metals, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cinelli Scrap Metals, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
275 BROADWAY
City
JERSEY CITY
State
NJ
ZIP
07306
Mailing
275 BROADWAY, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07306
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $1,542 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:  a) Facility  Personal protective equipment was not provided for employees who perform torch cutting activities exposed to burns from flying sparks.  Violation occurred on or about 11/19/2019.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1542
  • — C (S) $3084
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $1,542 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  a) Facility  The employer did not perform an assessment for the use of personal protective equipment for employees exposed to hazards of torch cutting and sorting metal.  Violation occurred on or about 11/19/2019.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1542
  • — C (S) $3084
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $1,542 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) Facility  The employer did not ensure employees exposed to flying particles and sparks use appropriate eye protection.  Violation occurred on or about 11/19/2019.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1542
  • — C (S) $3084
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Abate by
May 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $1,542 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Facility  The employer did not implement the written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to 3M 6502 half mask, negative pressure respirators while performing torch cutting activities.  Violation occurred on or about 01/23/2020.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1542
  • — C (S) $3084
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Abate by
May 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Facility  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees required to wear a respirator such as, but not limited to, 3M 6502 while performing torch cutting activities.  Violation occurred on or about 01/23/2020.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Abate by
May 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $1,542 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  a) Facility  An employee operates a Hyster forklift to move small containers and materials to be sorted.  The employer did not certify that the forklift operator was trained and evaluated.  Violation occurred on or about 11/19/2019.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1542
  • — C (S) $3084
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Abate by
May 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $3,084 · Current $1,542 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Facility  The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees using hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, oxygen and propane used for torch cutting.  Violation occurred on or about 11/20/2019.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1542
  • — C (S) $3084
  • — Z (S) $3084

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Abate by
May 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Chemical manufacturers and importers did not obtain or develop a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical and for each chemical that posed a hazard not otherwise classified that they produce or import:  a) Facility  The employer did not have safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical such as, but not limited to, oxygen and propane used for torch cutting.  Violation occurred on or about 11/20/2019.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2020
Abate by
May 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Facility  The employer did not provide effective information and training for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, oxygen and propane used to conduct torch cutting activities.  Violation occurred on or about 11/20/2019.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344456330.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.