OSHKOSH, WI —
OSHA Inspection: HOFFMASTER GROUP INC
Monitoring inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a monitoring safety inspection of HOFFMASTER GROUP INC in 2920 NORTH MAIN STREET, OSHKOSH, WI 54901 (NAICS 322291). OSHA activity number 344462148.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HOFFMASTER GROUP INC
- Site address
- 2920 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- OSHKOSH
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54901
- Mailing
- 2920 NORTH MAIN STREET, OSHKOSH, WI 54901
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Monitoring (D)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322291
- Employees
- 400
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 B10
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $6,554 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(10): Any ladder with structural or other defects is immediately tagged "Dangerous: Do Not Use" or with similar language in accordance with �1910.145 and removed from service until repaired in accordance with �1910.22(d), or replaced; (a) In the Legacy Department, by the #66 CG Bretting Mfg Co machine (Letterpress Printer, 4-Color, 10" Repeat, S/N: 2679-79) there was a mobile ladder which was not stable exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6554.35
- — Z (S) $7711
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following: Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: (a) In the Legacy Department, #27 Bretting Letterpress Printer (S/N: 2266 75) had an elevated platform approximately 63 inches above the ground without a self-closing gate or offset exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $7711
1910.137 C02 VIII
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $4,627 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.137(c)(2)(viii): Electrical protective equipment shall be subjected to periodic electrical tests. Test voltages and the maximum intervals between tests shall be in accordance with Table I-4 and Table I-5. Electrically rated gloves used to reset contactors had not been tested at intervals required exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4626.6
- — Z (S) $7711
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 20, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there are potential electrical hazards shall be provided with, and shall use, electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed. Note: Personal protective equipment requirements are contained in subpart I of this part. On or about December 17, 2019, an employee was observed on machine #130 offset printing press in the Placemat Department not utilizing electrical safe work practices. The employee was wearing a short sleeve work shirt and polyester hair net which was not appropriate for exposure to live electrical.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $9,639 · Current $5,783 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc. (a) In the Legacy Department, the #29 CG Bretting Mfg Co (S/N: 2798-80) had an unguarded inrunning nip point of the unwind machine for the roll guard. (b) In the Legacy Department, the #55 CG Bretting Mfg Co (4 Color Letterpress Printer, 10" Repeat, S/N: 2841-80) had the nip guard located by the embossing rollers in the lowered position exposing employees to pinch points. (c) In the Legacy Department, the # 50 CG Bretting Mfg Co had unguarded inrunning nip points on the top ink deck exposing employees to pinch points. (d) In the Legacy Department, the #7 High Speed CG Bretting Mfg Co (LCI Napkin Folder, S/N: 6327-16F) had inrunning nip points by the folding section exposing employees to caught in hazards. (e) In the Legacy Department, the #7 High Speed CG Bretting Mfg Co (LCI Napkin Folder, S/N: 6327-16F) had inrunning nip points by the Cam 0881 Fi Folder (drive side) and folder pull roll wrap up (drive side) exposing employees to caught in hazards. (f) In the Legacy Department, the High Speed #5 had a guard which was easily removed allowing access to rollers during operation exposing employees to pinch hazards. (g) In the Fluted Department, the Fluted Bagger had a damaged interlocked door (Schmeadsal Safety Component) exposing employees to moving parts. (h) By Fashion Point, the Baler by Balemaster had unguarded doors which allowed access to moving parts exposing employees to struck by hazards. (i) In the Lace Department, #330 lace machine had unguarded inrunning nip points on the green belt exposing employees to caught in hazards. (j) In the Lace Department, #330 lace machine had unguarded inrunning nip points on the spaghetti belts exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5783.4
- — Z (S) $9639
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $4,627 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle. (a) In Building 5, Prism High Speed Cutter (Model: QZK-920-1, Size: 92, S/N: 986,1039) had an unguarded clamp and the light curtain was positioned approximately 6 inches above the table which allowed access under the presence sensing guard, exposing employees to struck-by and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4626.6
- — Z (S) $7711
1910.217 E01 I A
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $9,639 · Current $5,783 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(e)(1)(i)(A): Conduct periodic and regular inspections of each power press to ensure that all of its parts, auxiliary equipment, and safeguards, including the clutch/brake mechanism, anti-repeat feature, and single-stroke mechanism, are in a safe operating condition and adjustment; The employer did not conduct periodic inspection of each of the Rousselle mechanical presses to ensure the safe operations exposing employees to struck by and caught between hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5783.4
- — Z (S) $9639
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,711 · Current $4,627 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform, excepting runways used exclusively for oiling, or running adjustments, shall be protected by a stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by a trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting as location requires. (a) In the Legacy Department, the #55 CG Bretting Mfg Co. (4 Color Letterpress Printer, 10" Repeat, S/N: 2841-80) napkin machine had an unguarded rotating shaft exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4626.6
- — Z (S) $7711
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2020
- Abate by
- Apr 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $67,470 · Current $10,795 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): (a) On or about August 28, 2019, an employee was exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts when they engaged in threading activities on the #72 CG Bretting (S/N: 3551-86, Single web 10" cocktail folder). The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps prior to allowing them to thread the machine. The machine was not deenergized and an one-hand jog button was utilized while the employee engaging in the threading activity. (b) On or about December 17, 2019, in Building 5, an employee was exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts when they engaged in clearing jam activities on the #330 Paper Converting Mach Co. The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps prior to allowing them to unjam the machine. The machine was not deenergized prior to the employee engaging in the servicing/maintenance activity. (c) On or about January 10, 2020, in the Legacy Department, an employee was exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts when they engaged in threading activities on the #16 CG Bretting Legacy Napkin Machine. The employer did not ensure that employees implemented energy control application steps prior to allowing them to thread the machine. The machine was de-energized, however, energy isolating devices were not applied prior to the employee engaging in the threading activity. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lockout/tagout device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)] were not implemented to protect employees from machine hazards. The Hoffmaster Group Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1910.147(d), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1200091, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on April 28, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 255 Spring St., Clintonville, Wisconsin.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $10795.15
- — Z (R) $67470
More inspections at Hoffmaster Group INC
View Hoffmaster Group INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322291)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344462148.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.