Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL ROCHA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL ROCHA in 507 RIVER ROCK WAY, ALLEN, TX 75002 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344466537.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Rocha — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Rocha is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIGUEL ROCHA
Site address
507 RIVER ROCK WAY
City
ALLEN
State
TX
ZIP
75002
Mailing
1500 LAYTON ST., HALTOM CITY, TX 76117
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    (a) On or about November 21, 2019 employees were exposed falling and flying objects. Employees were not provided with protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    (a) On or about November 21, 2019 employees were performing framing-cornice operations used pneumatic nail guns without the use of protective eyewear. Employees were exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.403 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(a): All electrical conductors and equipment were not approved:  (a) On or about November 21, 2019 employees were working at the jobsite with skill saws and other equipment were exposed to electrocution and electrical shock hazards from utilizing three extension cords plugged into an electrical receptacle outlet box. The jobsite made wooden electrical receptacle outlet box was not approved for use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:     (a) On or about November 21, 2019, employees were working at the jobsite with skill saws and other equipment requiring electrical equipment power were exposed to electrocution, and electrical shock hazards from a powered extension cord plugged into the jobsite electrical receptacle that had the power cord protective sleeve pulled out of the crimped clamp exposing the internal wiring. The power cord did not have a strain relief mechanism.    (b) On or about November 21, 2019, employees were working at the jobsite with an electrical air compressor and other equipment requiring electrical equipment power were exposed to electrocution, and electrical shock hazards from an extension cord plugged into the jobsite electrical receptacle that had the power cord protective sleeve pulled out of the crimped clamp exposing the internal wiring. The power cord did not have a strain relief mechanism.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  (a) On or about November 21, 2019 at the jobsite employees were utilizing a black extension cord where there was a black extension cord which had the primary insulation damaged exposing the secondary insulated conductors. Employees were exposed to electrical and electrocution hazards.   (b) On or about November 21, 2019 at the jobsite employees were utilizing a yellow extension cord where there was yellow extension cord which had the primary insulation damaged exposing the secondary insulated conductors. Employees were exposed to electrical and electrocution hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:    (a) On or about November 13, 2019 , northside of the jobsite, on the wood scaffold system, where employees were working from the first and second tier of the tubular welded scaffold platform footings were supported by unstable objects. Employees were exposed to scaffold collapse hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  (a) On or about November 13, 2019 , on the northside scaffold system, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 8-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 26, 2019
Abate by
Dec 23, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2): Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section:  (a) On or about November 13, 2019, northside tubular welded scaffold employees were not protected from impact from falling or flying objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344466537.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.